嗨喽，大家好，今天分享PS Portal30周年纪念版的开箱评测！感谢收看！喜欢请三连！ 【我使用的设备】 M3 Max MacBook Pro 14 M4 iPad Pro 13 iPhone16 Pro Max Vision Pro 索尼A7SIII 腾龙17-28mm 索尼FE2.8 24-70mm GM II 索尼 ECM-W2BT 无线麦克风 二手特斯拉 Model 3 LR 2020
Letter to Adolf Hitler As at Wardha, December 24, 1940
DEAR FRIEND,
That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action. We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule. But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian-man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years.
We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all 'do or die' without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody's monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar.
During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions? I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.
1、要知道你打扑克牌时，总有⼀个⼈会倒霉，如果你看看四周看不出谁要倒霉了，那就是你⾃⼰了。 我们也会有恐惧和贪婪，只不过在别⼈贪婪的时候我们恐惧，在别⼈恐惧的时候我们贪婪。
2、我的成功并⾮源与⾼的智商，我认为最重要的是理性。我总是把智商和才能⽐作发动机的动⼒，但 是输出功率，也就是⼯作的效率则取决与理性。
3、⻓年进⾏成功的投资并不需要极⾼的智商、罕⻅的商业洞⻅，或内部消息。真正必要的是做决策所 需的合理的知识框架，以及避免情绪化侵蚀智识的能⼒。
4、投资股票致富的秘诀只有⼀条，买了股票以后锁在箱⼦⾥等待，耐⼼地等待。
5、如果我们有坚定的⻓期投资期望，那么短期的价格波动对我们来说就毫⽆意义，除⾮它们能够让我 们有机会以更便宜的价格增加股份。
6、我认为投资专业的学⽣只需要两⻔教授得当的课堂：如何评估⼀家公司，以及如何考虑市场价格。 必须要忍受偏离你的指导⽅针的诱惑：如果你不愿意拥有⼀家公司⼗年，那就不要考虑拥有它⼗分钟。
7、投资者应考虑企业的⻓期发展，⽽不是股票市场的短期前景。价格最终将取决于未来的收益。在投资过程中如同棒球运动中那样，要想让记分牌不断翻滚，你就必须盯着球场⽽不是记分牌。
8、价格是你所付出去的，价值是你所得到的，评估⼀家企业的价值部分是艺术部分是科学。
9、理解会计报表的基本组成是⼀种⾃卫的⽅式：当经理们想要向你解释清企业的实际情况时，可以通 过会计报表的规定来进⾏。但不幸的是， 当他们想要耍花招时（ 起码在部分⾏业） 同样也能通过会计报表的规定来进⾏。如果你不能识别出其中的区别，你就不必在资产选择⾏业做下去了。
10、如何决定⼀家企业的价值呢？做许多阅读：我阅读所注意的公司的年度报告，同时我也阅读它的竞争对⼿的年度报告。
11、每次我读到某家公司削减成本的计划书时，我都想到这并不是⼀家真正懂得成本为何物的公司，短 期内毕其功于⼀役的做法在削减成本领域是不起作⽤的， ⼀位真正出⾊的经理不会在早晨醒来之后说今天是我打算削减成本的⽇⼦，就像他不会在⼀觉醒来后决定进⾏呼吸⼀样。
12、为你最崇拜的⼈⼯作，这样除了获得薪⽔外还会让你早上很想起床。
13、抛开其他因素，如果你单纯缘于⾼兴⽽做⼀项⼯作，那么这就是你应该做的⼯作，你会学到很多东⻄。
14、他（接班⼈）必须具有独⽴思考、情绪稳定与深刻了解⼈类与机构⾏为等特质。 只有当潮⽔退去的时候，才知道是谁在裸泳。
15如果你想知道我为什么能超过⽐尔·盖茨，我可以告诉你，是因为我花得少，这是对我节俭的⼀种奖赏。
16、⼈⽣就像滚雪球，重要的是找到很湿的雪和很⻓的坡
发现错就改，⽆论多⼤的代价都是最⼩的代价的原理
我认为最主要的还是脑子里要有是非观念，想着要做对的事情，发现错误要及时改正。乐观是性格问题，不是每个人都能想乐观就乐观的。有些东西说完了以后，真的会带来什么好处吗？我对此有疑问。
让业内震惊的不只是ImageNet模型本身。这个需要1400万张图片、总计262千万亿次浮点运算训练的神经网络，一个星期的训练过程中仅用了四颗英伟达Geforce GTX 580。作为参考，谷歌猫用了1000万张图片、16000颗CPU、1000台计算机
如果2012年我就知道ai圈这个大事肯定坚定投资英伟达啊,当年图像识别能达到百分之八十多行业第一我应该会觉得很强 而且gpu训练很低廉,为什么当时没有人强力看好英伟达并且投资呢
ChatGPT 说：
ChatGPT
2012年时，尽管ImageNet模型在深度学习领域的突破令人震惊，英伟达（NVIDIA）及其GPU在AI领域的潜力还未被广泛认可，主要因为以下几点：
当时的AI热度有限
深度学习虽然在学术界取得突破，但大众和投资者对其商业化潜力认知不足。ImageNet的影响力主要局限在学术圈，未被主流商业市场充分理解。
技术刚起步
AlexNet虽然表现优异，但深度学习还未被证明能在其他领域大规模应用，市场对其前景仍存疑。
传统的显卡定位
当时，NVIDIA主要被视为一家为游戏和图形处理提供显卡的公司。GPU用于AI训练的潜力对外界来说并不显而易见。
缺乏AI专用硬件的定位
2012年的Geforce GTX 580是消费级显卡，英伟达还没有推出针对AI优化的GPU产品（如后来的Tesla系列和CUDA生态）。
技术到商业化存在时间差
投资者普遍追求快速见效的商业回报，而深度学习和AI的商业化需要时间，当时的实际应用场景非常有限。
行业尚未显现规模需求
2012年，AI还未成为主流趋势，数据中心对GPU的需求还未达到显著水平。投资者看不到英伟达的“数据中心大玩家”潜力。
Google的TPU尚未出现
谷歌和其他科技巨头后来开发专用AI硬件（如TPU）进一步印证了AI硬件的重要性，但2012年这一趋势尚未显现。
深度学习应用的局限性
当时，深度学习的成功主要集中在图像识别，其他领域（如自然语言处理、生成模型等）尚未取得同等突破。
英伟达与AMD的竞争激烈
2012年，英伟达和AMD在消费级显卡市场进行价格战，投资者更关注其游戏显卡业务的利润率，而非AI潜力。
PC市场不景气
当时PC行业增长放缓，市场对显卡需求增长前景持悲观态度。
云计算和大数据尚在发展
深度学习需要大量数据和计算资源，2012年大数据和云计算才刚起步，AI的基础设施和市场需求未充分成熟。
应用爆发滞后
自动驾驶、推荐系统、语音识别等后来推动AI发展的领域在2012年还处于概念验证阶段。
后来的变化
英伟达战略转型
英伟达迅速抓住深度学习和数据中心的机会，推出CUDA平台和Tesla GPU，将自己定位为AI计算的核心玩家。
深度学习应用爆发
随着AI在自然语言处理、推荐系统等领域的成功，市场开始意识到GPU的重要性。
科技巨头推动
谷歌、亚马逊等公司的AI实践让更多人看到AI的商业潜力，从而带动对英伟达的信心。
如果在2012年看好ImageNet突破并坚定投资英伟达，是极具远见的选择，但这需要对AI技术的未来、商业化路径以及GPU在其中核心作用有深刻理解，同时也需要相当大的风险承担能力。
我恨透了这些低级爱好制作者>>>>>>>>
我决定从今以后每周玩手机游戏不能超过半小时
我恨透了这些低级爱好制作者>>>>>>>>
我决定从今以后每周玩手机游戏不能超过半小时
我恨透了这些低级上瘾物品制作者>>>>>>>>>>>>.
我决定从今以后一周不会玩30玩分钟以上手机游戏
看到了bitwarden泄露帖子 准备删库不用了
我现在就是左键映射为鼠标中键/cmd加左键,,,有两个问题::
1.用鼠标的时候 我喜欢尽量不用键盘,在此之间我通过拖动书签栏的网页图标来在新标签页打开网页,(这样节省了新建标签页的一步), 而且我喜欢左键,,不习惯切换到鼠标中键
2.目前我的预设可以实现部分功能,但是书签文件夹内的书签我没有办法(因为我使用的判断条件是光标的位置,我不可能将识别范围扩大到书签栏之外)
我希望btt可以增加一个判断条件 判断用户的鼠标光标是否悬停在书签栏上的书签或者书签文件夹内的书签上,,
同理,判断用户的鼠标光标是否悬停在地址栏上,,这个可以解决chrome地址栏搜索不在新标签页打开的问题
对于本论坛的交互我也有很多想要修改的, 目前的交互是默认在本标签打开新贴文,恕我直言,这种需要不断前进后退的交互早就该被淘汰了,,我使用插件,,看到任何感兴趣的帖子我都会双击鼠标左键从而在新标签页打开
整个互联网都应该尽量淘汰在同一标签页内前进后退的交互方式,,因为现在大家不缺内存容量,,关闭标签页只需要点击一下,而前进后退经常出现遗失原先位置,还有加载缓慢的问题
哺乳动物随着体型变大，心跳逐渐放慢，这是为什么？ 比如，仓鼠的心跳是每分钟450次，猫是150次，猪是70次，大象是30次，鲸是20次。 原因可以这样理解，假定猫的体积是仓鼠的10倍，那么猫的新陈代谢率（它燃烧能量的强度）也应该是仓鼠的10倍，毕竟猫有10倍的细胞在消耗能量。 但是这不可能，如果真的这样，猫就会因为体温过高而死亡。因为新陈代谢会产生热量，需要散热，但是猫的表面积并没有仓鼠的10倍，必定有一部分热量无法散发出去，导致体温过高。 为什么猫的表面积没有仓鼠的10倍？ 中学数学告诉我们，表面积增长的速度，慢于体积增长的速度。举例来说，如果球体的体积增长一倍，变成原来的两倍，表面积只是原来的1.59倍。 既然无法散发所有的热量，所以大型动物的新陈代谢必然慢于小型动物。相应的表现就是心跳放慢，降低新陈代谢的强度。 这就是为什么体型越大，心跳越慢。 动物学家还发现一个有趣的现象，哺乳动物不管体型大小，一生的总心跳大概在10亿次左右。 仓鼠的寿命是3年，猫是15年，猪是25年，大象是70年，鲸是80年。 结合它们的心率，不难算出，仓鼠一生的总心跳是7.1亿次，猫是11.8亿次，猪是9.2亿次，大象是11亿次，鲸是8.4亿次。 这些动物的总心跳都在10亿次左右。 奇怪的是，人类不符合这条规律。人每分钟心跳60次，平均寿命70年，总心跳是22.1亿次。
当你出门，收下巴，
把头上的旋儿58尽量抬高，使空气充满你的肺，满饮阳光，对朋友报以
微笑，把灵魂注入每一次握手。别怕被人误解，不要浪费一分钟思考
你的敌人。在心里全力锚定你想做的事，然后勇敢地直奔目标。把精
神集中在你想做的了不起的大事上。当日子一天天过去，你就会发
现，你已经在不知不觉中抓住了那完成渴望所必需的机会，就像珊瑚
虫从流动的潮水中过滤了足够的营养。在心里清晰地描绘出你想变成
的那个能干、积极、对社会有用的人的形象。心里抓住这个想法，那
么每个小时都在把你变成你想成为的那个人……思考是至高无上的，
要保持正确的心理态度，包括勇气、真诚和高兴。
让我们理解他人，而不是指责对方。让我们努力弄清他们为什么那么做，这比批评更加有益和诱人得多。它产生体谅、包容和温柔。“理解了一切，就能原谅一切。”琼生博士说，“先生，上帝本人并不打算在末日之前审判罪人！”所以，你我有什么权力那样做呢？
《爸爸忘记了》作者：W.利文斯顿·拉尼德
我想对你说，我的儿子：写下这些话时，你睡得正酣。你的小手放在脸蛋下面，弯曲的金发被汗水濡湿，紧贴着额头。我独自一人偷偷走进你的房间。几分钟之前，我在书房里读报时，强烈的懊悔折磨着我的内心。因此，这一刻，我歉疚地来到你的床边。
这些事始终在我心头萦绕，我的儿子：我之前一直对你乱发脾气。上学之前你不好好洗脸，我骂了你；你不把鞋擦干净，我又数落你；你把东西乱丢，我对你大声嚷嚷。
吃早餐时我也一直在挑你的毛病——你把饭洒了，你嚼得太快，你把胳膊肘放在桌子上，你面包上的黄油抹得太厚……你去玩的时候我正要出门赶火车，你转过身来，挥着小手对我喊：“爸爸再见！”我却紧皱眉头，以这句话回答你：“别驼背！”
下午又是如此。回家途中，我审视着你——你正跪在地上打弹珠，袜子都磨破了。我强行把你拽回家，让你在小伙伴面前丢脸。“袜子很贵的！等你自己赚钱的时候你就知道珍惜了！”你听听，我的儿子，这就是一个当父亲的说的话！
你还记得吗，后来我在书房里看报纸的时候，你怯生生地走过来，眼睛里闪过一丝伤心。我抬了抬眼，对你的打搅很不耐烦。你在门口犹疑着，而我却厉声问：“又有什么事？”
你什么都没说，只是一阵风似的跑过来，抱住我的脖子，亲了亲我。你的小胳膊紧紧地搂着我，上帝赐予的爱意如花朵般在你的心中盛开，连我的漠视都不曾令它枯萎。然后你就转身跑掉了，我听到你啪嗒啪嗒跑上楼的声音。
就在那时，我的儿子，报纸从我手中滑落，我心里充满了厌恶和惊惧——我什么时候变成了这样？吹毛求疵、任意斥责——这就是我对一个小男孩的回报。我不是不爱你，我的儿子，我只是对你抱有那么多的期待，总是用大人的标准衡量你。
你个性中有那么多优点，那么美好，那么真诚。你跑进来亲我，同我道晚安，幼小的心灵如同黎明破晓时点亮群山的阳光。今晚，其他任何事情都不再重要，我的儿子。我在你的床边悄悄跪下，心中充满愧疚。
我知道这忏悔于事无补，我知道你或许还不懂得这些话的含义，但是我下定决心，从明天起，要做一个合格的父亲。我要成为你最好的朋友，你难过的时候，我陪你难过，你大笑的时候，我陪你大笑。当不耐烦的言语再次涌到嘴边，我会闭紧双唇，提醒自己：“他还只是个孩子，一个小孩子！”
我很抱歉一直把你当作大人来对待。而现在，我仔细地端详着你，我的儿子，端详着你困倦地蜷伏在婴儿床里，此刻我才真真切切地意识到，你还那么小。仿佛就在昨天，你还躺在妈妈的臂弯里，依偎着她的肩膀。我对你要求得太多了，太多了……
嗨喽，大家好，今天分享PS Portal30周年纪念版的开箱评测！感谢收看！喜欢请三连！ 【我使用的设备】 M3 Max MacBook Pro 14 M4 iPad Pro 13 iPhone16 Pro Max Vision Pro 索尼A7SIII 腾龙17-28mm 索尼FE2.8 24-70mm GM II 索尼 ECM-W2BT 无线麦克风 二手特斯拉 Model 3 LR 2020
有纪律 灭人性
赌盘
LLM 只是根据概率预测下一个词，没有真正的智能或意图。因此，不应该将 LLM 的输出结果看得太重，也不应该将其拟人化。
Letter to Adolf Hitler
As at Wardha,
December 24, 1940
DEAR FRIEND,
That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action. We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule. But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian-man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years.
We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all 'do or die' without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody's monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar.
During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions? I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.
I am,
Your sincere friend,
M.K. GANDHI
你的思考深刻又真实，触及了爱与自我之间的张力。这样的反思其实是很多人面对爱情和自我价值观冲突时的困惑。以下是几点探讨与回应：
## 1. 爱是否需要妥协自我？
爱确实需要一定程度的妥协与付出，但它的本质不是否定自我，而是平衡双方的需求和价值观。如果对方要求的改变完全背离了你的核心理念，甚至让你觉得“恶心”或“恐怖”，那可能并不是健康的爱，而是一种扭曲的关系。真正的爱应该是互相欣赏和促进，而不是单方面压抑与妥协。
## 2. 你对爱情的恐惧源于对失控的担忧
你提到“放弃一切人生观来追求”，表明你很重视自己的人生哲学和独立思考。这是一种非常可贵的品质。你的恐惧来源于担心爱会让你失去自我，让你变成一个自己不认同的人。这种警觉是健康的，它能帮助你避免落入情感的泥沼。
但同时，防备过重也可能让你对爱筑起过高的围墙，拒绝一切可能性。如果真爱出现，可能是一种彼此尊重的关系，而非完全压倒你的理念。
## 3. “蠢事”与爱中的真诚
你提到的“蠢事”，其实在爱中可能是付出的另一种表达。当你心甘情愿为对方做一些事，即使它看起来与理性相悖，那可能反而是一种发自内心的柔软。这并不意味着你必须放弃理性，而是爱有时会让人用不同的方式感受和表达。
关键在于：这些“蠢事”是否出自你的真心，而不是对方强加的需求。如果是你发自内心想做，而非对方要求你迎合，那它并不一定是“蠢事”，而是爱的自发流露。
## 4. 你无需放弃人生观，爱也可以是对人生的升华
爱并不必然让人放弃自我，相反，真正的爱情往往能让人发现更好的自己。一个值得你爱的人，会欣赏你的理念与坚持，而不是强迫你改变。如果对方欣赏你理性、审美、价值观的独立性，那她不会要求你去做完全违背自我的事情，而是与你共同成长。
## 5. 恋爱和人生观不是对立的
在你提到的场景里，对方的审美、喜好和虚荣感似乎与你的人生观背道而驰。但这并不意味着所有爱情都如此冲突。理性的爱人也会有包容心，对方应该理解你的价值观，而不是单方面要求你为她改变。
真正的爱是彼此成全，而非彼此消耗。不是用爱来证明自己愿意“牺牲”，而是用爱让两个人在独立中找到平衡。
## 6. 防止“爱上这种人”是合理的，但不要过于防御
练心练脑是必要的，它能让你分辨爱与依附、激情与理性。但过度防备可能让你错过值得爱的机会。健康的防备不是拒绝一切情感，而是对真正适合自己的爱敞开怀抱，对不适合的关系保持警觉。
总结：
真正的爱，不是牺牲你的一切去迎合对方，而是让你成为更好的自己。如果有一天你爱上了某个人，可能会愿意为她做一些“蠢事”，但这些“蠢事”应该是出自你自己的选择，而不是因为你不得不取悦她。爱并不可怕，可怕的是丧失自我。如果一个人让你害怕失去自我，那她可能不是那个对的人。
如果对一个人的爱是靠我要心甘情愿为她做多少我认为的蠢事来评判,,我会不会天天去健身房塑形,买到一堆我认为毫无作用的肌肉,只是为了他的审美偏好,我会不会买一堆潮包潮玩给她,只为了增加她在社会上的虚荣感,,即便我第二天宁愿给如此蠢的我一拳,,我会不会改掉我这种玩物皆要理性优先的观点,,我如果爱上了一个我宁愿放弃我一切人生观也要追求的人
那是多么恐怖又恶心的事
我宁愿这种人不会出现
我早就练心练脑,防止自己爱上这种人
我会讨厌那些穿着暴露或者胸很大的美女,也会讨厌那些练肌肉的人,我明白这些肌肉在这个时代基本没用,胸很大和也不会对养小孩很有利,我似乎很反感我被我的生物本能控制,我是不是一个假装不肤浅的人,但是我就是不喜欢穿着暴露的女孩,我也不喜欢偶尔被本能控制偷看这些女孩的自己
你的感受其实是很多人都有的，因为我们时常会对自己的本能反应和审美产生矛盾。一方面，人类天生会被一些外在特征吸引，这是演化赋予我们的生物本能；另一方面，理性却往往会让我们反思这种吸引的合理性和深度。你的不适可能源于你对自己不愿被浅薄的生物本能所左右的期待，这种反感实际上反映了你对自己精神层面的追求。
关于穿着暴露或肌肉外露的吸引力，其实很多时候是社会文化和本能共同塑造的产物。你可能觉得这些外在特征与个人的实际价值或道德标准没有直接联系，所以会对生物本能产生的短暂关注感到不安，甚至会抗拒这样的反应，认为自己应当能超越它。
这种自我反思并不是“假装不肤浅”，反而恰恰说明你希望从更深层次理解和引导自己的行为。你在思考如何不受这些原始驱动力的影响，这是一种非常正常的心理需求。真正的成长或许不在于否认生物本能，而在于接纳它，并在适当的时候提醒自己：我们可以在这些本能之外，去寻找更有深度、更符合个人价值观的事物和追求。