Letter to Adolf Hitler As at Wardha, December 24, 1940
DEAR FRIEND,
That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action. We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule. But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian-man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years.
We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all 'do or die' without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody's monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar.
During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions? I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.
David Teller Software Tech Lead, Open Source Mentor, Mozilla Alumnus, Rust Contributor, Science & Data-oriented
PASQAL
École normale supérieure de Lyon 巴黎地区 联系方式 500+ 位好友
加为好友
发消息
更多 个人简介个人简介 I am both a developer, a researcher, a manager and an open-source mentor. I started coding at the age of 9, released my first commercial app at 13, and I haven’t stopped since then. Oh, and at some point, I realized that, somehow, most devices on the planet ended up running some of my work.
Operating manual: I thrive when leading small to medium teams against challenging and high-impact problems involving multiple stakeholders and tight requirements. I am not afraid of starting from ill-defined outlines, to work on cross-functional projects, to build bridges between teams that have distinct priorities and paradigms, to interact with product as well as end-users and to progressively turn early insight into actionable plans and metrics – and from there into reliable, high-performance code, documentation and tests. I trust my teams and take failures as opportunities to improve both myself and the processes in which I'm involved. Also, I typically learn a lot during the journey because, let's face it, there is so much to learn in the domain, and in my experience everybody knows important things that I don't know yet.
I enjoy mentoring, talking to audiences, blogging and, yes, coding and writing that documentation and these tests.
On my spare time, I may often be found on stage, as an improv actor, or on a bicycle, touring the countryside around Paris.I am both a developer, a researcher, a manager and an open-source mentor. I started coding at the age of 9, released my first commercial app at 13, and I haven’t stopped since then. Oh, and at some point, I realized that, somehow, most devices on the planet ended up running some of my work. Operating manual: I thrive when leading small to medium teams against challenging and high-impact problems involving multiple stakeholders and tight requirements. I am not afraid of starting from ill-defined outlines, to work on cross-functional projects, to build bridges between teams that have distinct priorities and paradigms, to interact with product as well as end-users and to progressively turn early insight into actionable plans and metrics – and from there into reliable, high-performance code, documentation and tests. I trust my teams and take failures as opportunities to improve both myself and the processes in which I'm involved. Also, I typically learn a lot during the journey because, let's face it, there is so much to learn in the domain, and in my experience everybody knows important things that I don't know yet. I enjoy mentoring, talking to audiences, blogging and, yes, coding and writing that documentation and these tests. On my spare time, I may often be found on stage, as an improv actor, or on a bicycle, touring the countryside around Paris. 热门技能 热门技能 Open Source • Distributed Systems • Leadership • Research • Technical Leadership
有纪律 灭人性
赌盘
随想 时事 比特币即将十万美金了 为什么一直不买 时装做自己看透世界的荒谬 还是假装自己不是疯子
傻子的共识是共识,疯子的,也是
LLM 只是根据概率预测下一个词，没有真正的智能或意图。因此，不应该将 LLM 的输出结果看得太重，也不应该将其拟人化。
Letter to Adolf Hitler
As at Wardha,
December 24, 1940
DEAR FRIEND,
That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action. We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule. But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian-man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years.
We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all 'do or die' without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody's monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar.
During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions? I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.
I am,
Your sincere friend,
M.K. GANDHI
你的思考深刻又真实，触及了爱与自我之间的张力。这样的反思其实是很多人面对爱情和自我价值观冲突时的困惑。以下是几点探讨与回应：
## 1. 爱是否需要妥协自我？
爱确实需要一定程度的妥协与付出，但它的本质不是否定自我，而是平衡双方的需求和价值观。如果对方要求的改变完全背离了你的核心理念，甚至让你觉得“恶心”或“恐怖”，那可能并不是健康的爱，而是一种扭曲的关系。真正的爱应该是互相欣赏和促进，而不是单方面压抑与妥协。
## 2. 你对爱情的恐惧源于对失控的担忧
你提到“放弃一切人生观来追求”，表明你很重视自己的人生哲学和独立思考。这是一种非常可贵的品质。你的恐惧来源于担心爱会让你失去自我，让你变成一个自己不认同的人。这种警觉是健康的，它能帮助你避免落入情感的泥沼。
但同时，防备过重也可能让你对爱筑起过高的围墙，拒绝一切可能性。如果真爱出现，可能是一种彼此尊重的关系，而非完全压倒你的理念。
## 3. “蠢事”与爱中的真诚
你提到的“蠢事”，其实在爱中可能是付出的另一种表达。当你心甘情愿为对方做一些事，即使它看起来与理性相悖，那可能反而是一种发自内心的柔软。这并不意味着你必须放弃理性，而是爱有时会让人用不同的方式感受和表达。
关键在于：这些“蠢事”是否出自你的真心，而不是对方强加的需求。如果是你发自内心想做，而非对方要求你迎合，那它并不一定是“蠢事”，而是爱的自发流露。
## 4. 你无需放弃人生观，爱也可以是对人生的升华
爱并不必然让人放弃自我，相反，真正的爱情往往能让人发现更好的自己。一个值得你爱的人，会欣赏你的理念与坚持，而不是强迫你改变。如果对方欣赏你理性、审美、价值观的独立性，那她不会要求你去做完全违背自我的事情，而是与你共同成长。
## 5. 恋爱和人生观不是对立的
在你提到的场景里，对方的审美、喜好和虚荣感似乎与你的人生观背道而驰。但这并不意味着所有爱情都如此冲突。理性的爱人也会有包容心，对方应该理解你的价值观，而不是单方面要求你为她改变。
真正的爱是彼此成全，而非彼此消耗。不是用爱来证明自己愿意“牺牲”，而是用爱让两个人在独立中找到平衡。
## 6. 防止“爱上这种人”是合理的，但不要过于防御
练心练脑是必要的，它能让你分辨爱与依附、激情与理性。但过度防备可能让你错过值得爱的机会。健康的防备不是拒绝一切情感，而是对真正适合自己的爱敞开怀抱，对不适合的关系保持警觉。
总结：
真正的爱，不是牺牲你的一切去迎合对方，而是让你成为更好的自己。如果有一天你爱上了某个人，可能会愿意为她做一些“蠢事”，但这些“蠢事”应该是出自你自己的选择，而不是因为你不得不取悦她。爱并不可怕，可怕的是丧失自我。如果一个人让你害怕失去自我，那她可能不是那个对的人。
如果对一个人的爱是靠我要心甘情愿为她做多少我认为的蠢事来评判,,我会不会天天去健身房塑形,买到一堆我认为毫无作用的肌肉,只是为了他的审美偏好,我会不会买一堆潮包潮玩给她,只为了增加她在社会上的虚荣感,,即便我第二天宁愿给如此蠢的我一拳,,我会不会改掉我这种玩物皆要理性优先的观点,,我如果爱上了一个我宁愿放弃我一切人生观也要追求的人
那是多么恐怖又恶心的事
我宁愿这种人不会出现
我早就练心练脑,防止自己爱上这种人
我会讨厌那些穿着暴露或者胸很大的美女,也会讨厌那些练肌肉的人,我明白这些肌肉在这个时代基本没用,胸很大和也不会对养小孩很有利,我似乎很反感我被我的生物本能控制,我是不是一个假装不肤浅的人,但是我就是不喜欢穿着暴露的女孩,我也不喜欢偶尔被本能控制偷看这些女孩的自己
你的感受其实是很多人都有的，因为我们时常会对自己的本能反应和审美产生矛盾。一方面，人类天生会被一些外在特征吸引，这是演化赋予我们的生物本能；另一方面，理性却往往会让我们反思这种吸引的合理性和深度。你的不适可能源于你对自己不愿被浅薄的生物本能所左右的期待，这种反感实际上反映了你对自己精神层面的追求。
关于穿着暴露或肌肉外露的吸引力，其实很多时候是社会文化和本能共同塑造的产物。你可能觉得这些外在特征与个人的实际价值或道德标准没有直接联系，所以会对生物本能产生的短暂关注感到不安，甚至会抗拒这样的反应，认为自己应当能超越它。
这种自我反思并不是“假装不肤浅”，反而恰恰说明你希望从更深层次理解和引导自己的行为。你在思考如何不受这些原始驱动力的影响，这是一种非常正常的心理需求。真正的成长或许不在于否认生物本能，而在于接纳它，并在适当的时候提醒自己：我们可以在这些本能之外，去寻找更有深度、更符合个人价值观的事物和追求。
终于实现了 备忘 交互
我发现我安装完yabai之后只需要# 关闭空间切换动画
yabai -m config window_animation_duration 0.0
就能实现我的所有要求了
怎么禁用yabai的其他功能 还是说我不需要任何操作
ChatGPT 说：
ChatGPT
记忆已更新
你只需要在配置文件中设置 yabai -m config window_animation_duration 0.0 来关闭空间切换动画，不需要其他操作。Yabai 的其他功能在未设置的情况下不会主动生效，所以不需要特别禁用。
sudo yabai --load-sa 每次开机输入这个激活
具体:
yabai: '--install-sa' is not a valid option!
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~ [1]> yabai -m space --focus
value '' is not a valid option for SPACE_SEL
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~ [1]> Yabai 源码 git clone https://github.com/koekeishiya/yabai.git cd yabai # 编译项目 make install
fatal: destination path 'yabai' already exists and is not an empty directory.
rm -rf ./bin
mkdir -p ./bin
xcrun clang src/manifest.m src/osax/payload_bin.c src/osax/loader_bin.c -std=c11 -Wall -Wextra -DNDEBUG -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -mmacosx-version-min=11.0 -fno-objc-arc -arch x86_64 -arch arm64 -sectcreate __TEXT __info_plist ./assets/Info.plist -F/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks -framework Carbon -framework Cocoa -framework CoreServices -framework CoreVideo -framework SkyLight -o bin/yabai
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> sudo ./scripts/install-sa.sh
sudo: ./scripts/install-sa.sh: command not found
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master) [1]> sudo yabai --load-sa
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> yabai -m config window_animation_duration 0.0
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> sudo yabai --load-sa
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)>
具体步骤如下
git clone https://github.com/koekeishiya/yabai.git cd yabai # 编译项目 make installa1@1deMacBook-Air ~ [1]> Yabai 源码
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> sudo ./scripts/install-sa.sh
sudo: ./scripts/install-sa.sh: command not found
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master) [1]> sudo yabai --load-sa
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> yabai -m config window_animation_duration 0.0
a1@1deMacBook-Air ~/yabai (master)> sudo yabai --load-sa
中国就是二百年前镀金时代的美国 当时美国偷欧洲的技术 挖人美滋滋,能偷是最划算的
基础科学的研究纯纯吃力不讨好,偷性价比高的多
对于中国国民来说,能偷到 而且不被发现 是很幸福的事 你的工资来源于这个
等到未来没有东西可偷 就要自己研发被别人偷了
长期计划 随想 认知一直都可以变现:::
视频标题: 法国人押注川普赢得5000万美金, 美国民调机构为何错得离谱｜美国大选｜博彩网站｜纽约时报｜华尔街日报｜特朗普｜王局拍案20241112
关键要点总结：
特朗普赢得美国总统选举，四年前落败后通过坚持重新赢回总统位置。
埃隆·马斯克在选举前押注特朗普，投入1700万美元，最终由于特斯拉股价上涨，马斯克财富突破3000亿美元。
一位法国人（To）通过博彩网站Poly Market，投入2800万美元押注特朗普获胜，最终赢得5000万美元。
To通过精确的投注策略，选择押注特朗普赢得三大摇摆州，成功获利。
To认为美国民调机构低估了特朗普的支持，认为很多选民由于媒体偏见而不愿公开支持特朗普（“害羞选民”现象）。
他认为美国民调数据经常存在偏差，尤其是主流媒体和部分民调机构通过数据加权调整影响结果。
To指责美国主流民调机构存在数据操控，通过加权数据来提高特定群体（如受教育程度较高的白人群体）的比例。
对比2016年、2020年和2024年的民调数据，To发现特朗普的支持者总是被低估，且媒体与民调公司未能准确反映真实的选民意图。
他通过对民调数据的深入分析，找到了有利于特朗普的趋势，最终成功获利。
通过To的成功投注，揭示了美国民调机构的系统性问题，特别是在抽样和统计方法上的误差。
对于美国选举，民调机构的失误不仅影响选举预测，还削弱了公众对民调的信任。
视频强调，尽管外界对民调的质疑较大，To通过精准的分析找到了正确的路径，从而取得了巨大的财务成功。
视频最后提到，To能够在众多错误的判断中找到正确的路径，这种“知行合一”的决策方式使他能够在大选中获利50百万美元，证明了在关键时刻做出正确决策的重要性。
左派平等至上，右派自由无价，社会没有絶对的平等和绝对的自由，要完全平等，自由就必然受限制，要完全自由就会失去平等。可憐现在的人没钱的时候要平等，有了钱以后爱自由。
长期计划 我现在最大的问题是 做事没计划 太随心所欲了点
选举人团制度的优点在于保护小州利益、鼓励候选人关注多元选民，且减少了全国性计票争议的风险。但缺点也很明显，包括普选票和选举人票不一致的可能性、“赢家通吃”规则的局限性、摇摆州的过度重要性等。这种制度带有历史的妥协背景，但在现代引发了越来越多的争议和关于改革的讨论
思考 编程
这篇文章的作者从 8 岁就开始编程，并在职业生涯的大部分时间里都是一名开发人员。作者在文中分享了对他思维方式产生重大影响的几种编程语言。
●
Basic 语言开启了作者编程之旅，让他体会到编写游戏的乐趣，并初步了解了数组、GOTO 和 GOSUB 等概念。
●
（Turbo）Pascal 语言是作者使用时间最长且对他影响最深的语言，让他了解到结构化编程、模块化编程和面向对象编程等重要概念。此外，Pascal 语言还让作者第一次接触到 IDE、编译器、调试器和 UI 工具包等开发工具，并意识到开发者社区的重要性。
●
x86 汇编语言让作者深入了解了计算机底层运作机制，包括内存寻址、堆栈、中断和寄存器等概念。作者通过学习汇编语言，能够直接与图形适配器交互，实现更高级的图形效果。
●
HyperCard 语言为作者打开了脚本语言和可视化编程的大门，让他体会到自然语言编程和用户体验抽象的魅力。作者认为，HyperCard 语言对后来的 Visual Basic、Visual Studio 等可视化开发工具以及网页设计都产生了深远影响。
●
（O）Caml 语言让作者领略到函数式编程的强大和优雅，并学习了参数多态、类型推断、模式匹配、高阶函数、单子、延续传递风格、消息传递并发和多级编程等重要概念。作者认为，OCaml 语言对 Rust、F#、Elm 和 ReasonML 等语言的发展产生了重要影响。
●
Java 语言为作者提供了丰富的标准库和易于理解的文档，并让他了解了 JVML、JIT 编译和同步原语等概念。尽管作者认为 Java 语言不如 OCaml 优雅，但 Java 语言的广泛应用和强大的生态系统还是让他受益匪浅。
●
Prolog 语言颠覆了作者对编程的认知，让他意识到可以教程序如何思考，而不是编写算法。作者认为，Prolog 语言对 SQL、C++ 模板系统和 Rust 类型系统等方面都产生了影响。
●
Coq 语言将类型提升到规范的高度，并将程序视为证明，让作者对类型系统和形式化验证有了更深刻的理解。作者认为，Coq 语言可以用来构建可靠的 LLM。
●
Erlang 语言让作者体验到分布式系统编程的简洁和高效，并学习了“let it fail”设计理念。作者认为，Erlang 语言对 Scala、Go 等语言以及微服务架构和 Actor 模型的发展都产生了影响。
●
π 演算虽然不是编程语言，但它为作者提供了一种全新的视角来理解并发和分布式系统，并让他意识到无需顺序操作即可实现图灵完备性。
●
Opalang 语言是作者参与设计和开发的语言，它融合了多种编程范式和技术，并实现了客户端、服务器端和数据库端代码的自动拆分。作者认为，Opalang 语言的理念过于超前，但它对多层编程的探索具有重要意义。
●
Rust 语言结合了 OCaml 和 Haskell 等语言的优点，并提供了编写高并发代码和系统级程序的能力。作者认为，Rust 语言的类型系统和安全保障让他在使用其他语言时倍感担忧。
作者在文章的最后总结道，他使用过许多编程语言，但只有少数几种语言真正改变了他的思维方式。他认为，编程语言的选择不仅关乎语法和功能，更关乎思维模式和解决问题的方式。
长期计划
很简练
David Teller
Software Tech Lead, Open Source Mentor, Mozilla Alumnus, Rust Contributor, Science & Data-oriented
PASQAL
École normale supérieure de Lyon
巴黎地区 联系方式
500+ 位好友
加为好友
发消息
更多
个人简介个人简介
I am both a developer, a researcher, a manager and an open-source mentor. I started coding at the age of 9, released my first commercial app at 13, and I haven’t stopped since then. Oh, and at some point, I realized that, somehow, most devices on the planet ended up running some of my work.
Operating manual: I thrive when leading small to medium teams against challenging and high-impact problems involving multiple stakeholders and tight requirements. I am not afraid of starting from ill-defined outlines, to work on cross-functional projects, to build bridges between teams that have distinct priorities and paradigms, to interact with product as well as end-users and to progressively turn early insight into actionable plans and metrics – and from there into reliable, high-performance code, documentation and tests. I trust my teams and take failures as opportunities to improve both myself and the processes in which I'm involved. Also, I typically learn a lot during the journey because, let's face it, there is so much to learn in the domain, and in my experience everybody knows important things that I don't know yet.
I enjoy mentoring, talking to audiences, blogging and, yes, coding and writing that documentation and these tests.
On my spare time, I may often be found on stage, as an improv actor, or on a bicycle, touring the countryside around Paris.I am both a developer, a researcher, a manager and an open-source mentor. I started coding at the age of 9, released my first commercial app at 13, and I haven’t stopped since then. Oh, and at some point, I realized that, somehow, most devices on the planet ended up running some of my work. Operating manual: I thrive when leading small to medium teams against challenging and high-impact problems involving multiple stakeholders and tight requirements. I am not afraid of starting from ill-defined outlines, to work on cross-functional projects, to build bridges between teams that have distinct priorities and paradigms, to interact with product as well as end-users and to progressively turn early insight into actionable plans and metrics – and from there into reliable, high-performance code, documentation and tests. I trust my teams and take failures as opportunities to improve both myself and the processes in which I'm involved. Also, I typically learn a lot during the journey because, let's face it, there is so much to learn in the domain, and in my experience everybody knows important things that I don't know yet. I enjoy mentoring, talking to audiences, blogging and, yes, coding and writing that documentation and these tests. On my spare time, I may often be found on stage, as an improv actor, or on a bicycle, touring the countryside around Paris.
热门技能
热门技能
Open Source • Distributed Systems • Leadership • Research • Technical Leadership
长期计划 本性
因为携带这些本性基因,今日才得以存在,没必要为自己本性占据大脑后悔
比如
1.尽量在实体生活中满足最低需要的社交欲望,每个人天生会有最低限度的社交需求,如果哪天我的朋友圈发的太多,要么是这个时期基因到激素的链子告诉我的社交欲不满了,要么就是我在无意义社交了
生活满意的时候,我绝对要尽量不发朋友圈
2.节食瘦身虽好,之后带来的饥饿或许还能忍的住,但是我的大脑比我想象中的聪明,他已经逐渐把饥饿反馈变为"精神萎靡"的反馈,大脑他知道我不怕饿,但我怕看着文章困乏,甚至学习新信息效率可能变为三分之一,
每个人生来要和自己的大脑共生 又得反抗他三万天,仅仅三万天啊,聪明人的好处不用多提,坏处就是成年后很难再形成一个信仰武器,利用执念和意志力反抗自己的大脑激素武器了,当然,你会发现这段话的前提是:聪明人成年后就很难迷信什么东西了
3.不想找个伴侣,那就原谅自己每个月一次的自慰吧,本性让你为此而生,每次之后的内疚空虚感是不是表示你又输给了自己的大脑,哈哈,毕竟你要和他共生三万天,反过来说,生存压力小的时候,大脑在你原有的性欲本能基础上很难再发送增强信息了,你特别想谈恋爱的时候不妨问下自己,到底自己的生存压力是不是增加了,源于哪里.
对于我这种一直在逆天而行,让自己完全透明,是不是踹下自己大脑的傻子而言,我没有秀恩爱真的是我的生存压力很小
我似乎做出了明智的选择,如果我放弃了未雨绸缪的说法:生存压力大时,会过于迫切以遇到心性不合适的伴侣
但是我翻箱倒柜地想:我还是认为我有自信心讲这种没有生存压力的生活维持的更久些
fuckkkkkkK短视频沉迷四小时 吐槽
思考 随想 长期计划
智商税:高智商的人,明白自己每天都会使用 要用的太久的东西,比如衣服手机电脑空调就是要买最贵最好的,有一个就够了
只有高智商的愿意交这一笔税
其实是指一种选择质量与长期价值的消费习惯。相较于追求短期性价比，高智商消费者往往更倾向于购买高质量、耐用的产品，因为他们意识到高频率地更换低价、劣质物品反而会造成长期的资源浪费和时间成本的增加。
这种消费心理可以被认为是一种“长期价值投资”的思维。心理学研究指出，高智商人群倾向于更理性地评估消费选择，注重实际效益和长远使用体验，而不仅仅是初始成本的低廉。这种行为往往与长期主义（long-termism）相关，是一种关注长久利益的思维模式，体现在选购手机、电脑等必备品时愿意花费更多以获得最佳体验和耐用性。
此外，这种消费习惯并不仅限于所谓的“智商税”问题，更是对高品质生活和理性消费观念的一种追求，反映了人们在消费观念上逐步向更可持续、品质优先的方向转变。
查找 gpt账号[email protected]
支离东北风尘际，漂泊西南天地间。
三峡楼台淹日月，五溪衣服共云山。
羯胡事主终无赖，词客哀时且未还。
庾信平生最萧瑟，暮年诗赋动江关。